20 CFR 403.130
§ 403.130 What factors may the Commissioner consider in determining whether SSA will grant your application for testimony?
United States · 20 CFR — Employees' Benefits · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 20 CFR 403.130, § 403.130 What factors may the Commissioner consider in determining whether SSA will grant your application for testimony?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/78122
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:78122@1- SHA-256
da7e03a514764a2e7499a86bdb66d3f7dddd375f1480c82e3e031db8e1b6a09b
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
In deciding whether to authorize the testimony of an SSA employee, the Commissioner will consider applicable law and factors relating to your need and the burden to SSA. The considerations include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Risk of law violation or compromise of Government privilege.
(1) Would providing the testimony violate a statute (such as 26 U.S.C. 6103 or section 1106 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1306), Executive Order, or regulation (such as 20 CFR part 401)?
(2) Would providing the testimony put confidential, sensitive, or privileged information at risk?
(b) Burden on SSA.
(1) Would granting the application unduly expend for private purposes the resources of the United States (including the time of SSA employees needed for official duties)?
(2) Would the testimony be available in a less burdensome form or from another source?
(3) Would the testimony be limited to the purpose of the request?
(4) Did you previously request the same testimony in the same or a related proceeding?
(c) Interests served by allowing testimony.
(1) Would providing the testimony serve SSA's interest?
(2) Would providing the testimony maintain SSA's policy of impartiality among private litigants?
(3) Is another government agency involved in the proceeding?
(4) Do you need the testimony to prevent fraud or similar misconduct?
(5) Would providing the testimony be necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the rights of an accused individual to due process in a criminal proceeding?
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.