yourstate.us
20 CFR 416.1437

§ 416.1437 Protecting the safety of the public and our employees in our hearing process.

United States · 20 CFR — Employees' Benefits · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
20 CFR 416.1437, § 416.1437 Protecting the safety of the public and our employees in our hearing process, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/79683
Permanent ID
ys:prov:79683@1
SHA-256
1e2a57a3af18e42e5e0d45bbf48599307c483a16527f099ac89278c8d6f4b7d5

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in this part or part 422 of this chapter, we are establishing the procedures set out in this section to ensure the safety of the public and our employees in our hearing process. (b)(1) At the request of any hearing office employee, the Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judge will determine, after consultation with the presiding administrative law judge, whether a claimant or other individual poses a reasonable threat to the safety of our employees or other participants in the hearing. The Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judge will find that a claimant or other individual poses a threat to the safety of our employees or other participants in the hearing when he or she determines that the individual has made a threat and there is a reasonable likelihood that the claimant or other individual could act on the threat or when evidence suggests that a claimant or other individual poses a threat. In making a finding under this paragraph, the Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judge will consider all relevant evidence, including any information we have in the claimant's record and any information we have regarding the claimant's or other individual's past conduct. (2) If the Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judge determines that the claimant or other individual poses a reasonable threat to the safety of our employees or other participants in the hearing, the Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judge will either: (i) Require the presence of a security guard at the hearing; or (ii) Require that the hearing be conducted by audio, notwithstanding any objection to appearing by audio, or, if the claimant agrees, by online video. (c) If we have banned a claimant from any of our facilities, we will provide the claimant with the opportunity for a hearing that will be conducted by audio, notwithstanding any objection to appearing by audio, or, if the claimant agrees, by online video. (d) The actions of the Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judge taken under this section are final and not subject to further review. (e) For audio appearances under this section, we will call you or any other party to the hearing using your or their telephone number(s).

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.