yourstate.us
20 CFR 683.740

§ 683.740 What is the procedure to handle a recipient of title I Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act funds' request for advance approval of contemplated corrective actions?

United States · 20 CFR — Employees' Benefits · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
20 CFR 683.740, § 683.740 What is the procedure to handle a recipient of title I Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act funds' request for advance approval of contemplated corrective actions?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/81542
Permanent ID
ys:prov:81542@1
SHA-256
a1fc7be2b213d2249f64bfceb3d72cac0f705f33bec7027d913417e51f1f273f

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) The recipient may request advance approval from the Grant Officer for contemplated corrective actions, including debt collection actions, which the recipient plans to initiate or to forego. The recipient's request must include a description and an assessment of all actions taken to collect the misspent funds. (b) Based on the recipient's request, the Grant Officer may determine that the recipient may forego certain debt collection actions against a subrecipient when: (1) The subrecipient meets the criteria set forth in WIOA sec. 184(d)(2); (2) The misexpenditure of funds: (i) Was not made by that subrecipient but by an entity that received WIOA funds from that subrecipient; (ii) Was not a violation of WIOA sec. 184(d)(1), did not constitute fraud, or failure to disclose, in a timely manner, all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the Federal award; or (iii) If fraud did exist: (A) It was perpetrated against the subrecipient; (B) The subrecipient discovered, investigated, reported, and cooperated in any prosecution of the perpetrator of the fraud; and (C) After aggressive debt collection action, it has been documented that further attempts at debt collection from the perpetrator of the fraud would be inappropriate or futile; (3) A determination which disallows the misexpenditure and establishes a debt has been issued at the appropriate level; and, (4) Further debt collection action by that subrecipient or the recipient would be either inappropriate or futile.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.