5 CFR 890.1039
§ 890.1039 Cases where additional fact-finding is required.
United States · 5 CFR — Administrative Personnel · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 5 CFR 890.1039, § 890.1039 Cases where additional fact-finding is required, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/8947
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:8947@1- SHA-256
95b7252c62c2032f7e8a38d01e8e7a96adddda933041a553fa3919dc829f4711
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) Criteria for holding fact-finding proceeding. The debarring official shall request another OPM official (“presiding official”) to hold an additional fact-finding proceeding if:
(1) Facts material to the suspension have not been adjudicated in a prior due process proceeding; and
(2) These facts are genuinely in dispute, based on the entire administrative record available to the debarring official.
(b) Qualification to serve as presiding official. The presiding official is designated by the OPM Director or another OPM official authorized by the Director to make such designations. The presiding official shall be a senior official who is qualified to conduct informal adjudicative proceedings and who has had no previous contact with the suspension or the contest.
(c) Effect on contest. The suspending official shall defer a final decision on the contest pending the results of the fact-finding proceeding.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.