23 CFR 636.114
§ 636.114 What factors should be considered in risk allocation?
United States · 23 CFR — Highways · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 23 CFR 636.114, § 636.114 What factors should be considered in risk allocation?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/96925
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:96925@1- SHA-256
50e02670547c7e080b2d78e232da126e39881c0f7e8334763b2b20177344bb53
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) You may consider, identify, and allocate the risks in the RFP document and define these risks in the contract. Risk should be allocated with consideration given to the party who is in the best position to manage and control a given risk or the impact of a given risk.
(b) Risk allocation will vary according to the type of project and location, however, the following factors should be considered:
(1) Governmental risks, including the potential for delays, modifications, withdrawal, scope changes, or additions that result from multi-level Federal, State, and local participation and sponsorship;
(2) Regulatory compliance risks, including environmental and third-party issues, such as permitting, railroad, and utility company risks;
(3) Construction phase risks, including differing site conditions, traffic control, interim drainage, public access, weather issues, and schedule;
(4) Post-construction risks, including public liability and meeting stipulated performance standards; and
(5) Right-of-way risks including acquisition costs, appraisals, relocation delays, condemnation proceedings, including court costs and others.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.