yourstate.us

Nebraska 3rd congressional district

NE-3 · 119th Congress (2020 Census) · 652,059 residents · Federal money here

These lines have been in force since the 118th Congress.

Where NE-3 sits in Nebraska

NE-3 is outlined among the 2 other seats in Nebraska. Hover any district for its representative and its average weekly wage; click to open it. Colour shows the party of the sitting member, not the value, and the outline is a deliberately non-party colour so a highlighted seat cannot be misread as one. Boundaries are the 119th Congress plan.

Embed this chart

Current representative

Adrian Smith

Republican · holding this seat since 2007

Recorded votes

Yea 7,972Nay 4,509

of 12,671 roll calls across their career.

Government experience

  • House · NE-32025–2027
  • House · NE-32023–2025
  • House · NE-32021–2023
  • House · NE-32019–2021
  • House · NE-32017–2019
  • House · NE-32015–2017
  • House · NE-32013–2015
  • House · NE-32011–2013
  • House · NE-32009–2011
  • House · NE-32007–2009

Where their votes land

Democratic side100 · Voted with Republicans almost every timeRepublican side
  • Average House Democrat: 2
  • Average House Republican: 98

Overall, averaged across 7 values of hand-picked votes that split the parties.

Embed this chart

Where the money came from

Receipts into Adrian Smith’s own campaign committee over the 2025–2026 election cycle, through June 30, 2026.

  • Small individual donors$3,630
  • Large individual donors$382,116
  • PACs$1,299,250
  • Transfers in$43,918
  • Other and unclassified$48,500
  • Total receipts$1,777,414
Embed this chart
What these categories mean
Small individual donors
People whose giving stayed under $200 in total. The FEC does not require them to be named, so who they are is genuinely unknown — not merely unlisted.
Large individual donors
People whose giving passed $200, which is the point at which the campaign must report their name, employer and occupation.
PACs
Political action committees — corporate, trade, union and ideological. Money from an organisation rather than from a person.
Transfers in
Money moved in from another committee the candidate is authorised by, typically a joint fundraising committee.
Other and unclassified
The remainder once every category above is accounted for: federal funds, offsets, interest, and anything this site could not classify. It is a residual, not a kind of donor.

This is money the campaign itself received. It is not everything spent to win the seat. It excludes leadership PACs, and it excludes independent expenditures and other outside spending — money spent to elect or defeat a candidate by groups they may not lawfully coordinate with, which in a contested race can exceed everything shown above. It is not personal income or net worth, which are a separate filing altogether. Figures are as filed with the Federal Election Commission and are only as current as the last report, covering through June 30, 2026; a cycle still running is a partial count. Check this filing on fec.gov.

Personal finances

Separately from the campaign money above, Adrian Smith files a report about their own money: what they own, what they owe, what they earn outside Congress, and every stock trade they make. The law requires it, and every figure in it is a range rather than an amount — which is why the columns below are ranges too.

What they report owning, and owing
  • Reported assets$1.1M to $2.6M25 lines, 1 with no figure
  • Reported debts$1.6M to $6.3M5 lines

Every column is read from $0. The solid height is the total of the low ends of the bands the filer ticked; the pale cap runs on to the total of the high ends, and is the range the form allows — not a margin of error and not a guess. Assets less debts comes to -$5.2M to $1000k — a range, and not a net worth: the form does not ask about a personal residence that earns nothing, about congressional salary, or about the exact value of anything.

Embed this chart
What the holdings are
  • Property and land5 holdings$615k to $1.3M
  • Private businesses and partnerships3 holdings$350k to $700k
  • Funds and managed accounts1 holding$100k to $250k
  • Bonds, cash and other securities6 holdings$34k to $160k
  • Retirement, pensions and insurance7 holdings$21k to $140k
  • Everything else2 holdings, 1 with no figure$15k to $50k
  • Stocks and stock options1 holding$1k to $15k
  • Every group$1.1M to $2.6M

A slice needs one number and a filer ticks a range, so each arc is its group’s floor — the total of the low ends they ticked — and the figure in the hole is the total of those floors. The band printed beside each group is the real answer, and it is wider than the arc. 1 holding carry no figure at all and are in no arc.

Embed this chart

From Adrian Smith’s own financial disclosure, filed under the Ethics in Government Act. Every figure is the band the filer ticked.

Latest figures — Measured on this ground since they took the seat

Click one of the figures to see how it has changed over time.

  • Population652,059▲ up 18.0%2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Median age40.2 yrs▼ down 0.2%2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Median income$68,556▲ up 62.3%up 11.0% after inflation2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Poverty rate10.9%▼ down 1.1 pp2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Child poverty rate12.5%▼ down 3.1 pp2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Unemployment rate2.6%▼ down 1.8 pp2007-2011 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Unemployment (BLS)2.9% allocated▼ down 1.3 pp2009 → 2025redrawnearliest
  • SNAP receipt8.3%▼ down 0.0 pp2008-2012 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Gini index0.443▲ up 6.4%2006-2010 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Median home value$180,300▲ up 105.1%up 40.3% after inflation2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Median gross rent$859▲ up 60.6%up 9.8% after inflation2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Cost-burdened renters40.8%▲ up 4.9 pp2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Homeownership rate71.6%▲ up 0.6 pp2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Housing vacancy rate11.8%▼ down 1.5 pp2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Uninsured rate7.7%▼ down 4.4 pp2008-2012 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Disability rate14.2%▲ up 1.4 pp2008-2012 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Overdose deaths5.9 per 100k allocatedno earlier figure2022-2024
  • Child mortality55.4 per 100k allocatedno earlier figure2020-2024
  • Teen births8.3 per 1k▼ down 73.6%2006-2010 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Bachelor's+25.0%▲ up 5.8 pp2005-2009 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • No internet9.5%▼ down 12.5 pp2013-2017 → 2020-2024redrawnearliest
  • Firearm deaths10.6 per 100k allocatedno earlier figure2020-2024
  • Injury deaths79.0 per 100k allocatedno earlier figure2020-2024
  • Crash deaths17.3 per 100k allocatedno earlier figure2020-2024
  • GDP$56.2B allocated▲ up 61.7%up 22.2% after inflation2015 → 2024redrawnearliest
  • GDP per person$86,087 allocated▲ up 50.5%up 13.7% after inflation2015 → 2024redrawnearliest
  • Covered jobs287.7k allocatedno earlier figure2024
  • Weekly wage$991 allocatedno earlier figure2024
  • Income per person$66,402 allocated▲ up 40.4%up 6.1% after inflation2015 → 2024redrawnearliest
  • Businesses24.0k allocatedno earlier figure2024

Each arrow is the latest published figure against the newest one published before Adrian Smith took this seat, with the two periods named beside it. A rate moves in percentage points; every other indicator is shown as a share of where it started, and a dollar figure also by how much it moved after inflation, with both figures restated in the same year’s dollars. A row marked redrawn is one whose district lines moved between the two figures: they describe different ground, so that change belongs to the seat number rather than to a fixed piece of land. A row marked earliest had nothing published before they took the seat, so it is measured from the first figure there is — a window that starts inside their tenure rather than at the beginning of it. These are conditions in the district, not a record of the member. Nothing here is evidence that they caused any of it, or that a different representative would have produced different numbers.

Average weekly pay across all covered jobs.

  • United Statesreference$1,454
  • Nebraskareference$1,174
  • NE-3$991

2024 · US Bureau of Labor Statistics

Average weekly wage has one published period (2024) for this seat, so there is nothing to draw a line between and no trend to show. The columns are that one figure and the levels above this seat at the same period, all read from zero.

Embed this chart
Average weekly wage by period, with 90% margins of error, the same figures in 2025 dollars, and the share of the district's population represented by the sources each allocated figure was built from.
PeriodWeekly wageIn 2025 dollarsMargin of errorCoverageCongress
2024$991 allocated$1,017—100.0%118th

The "in 2025 dollars" figures are the published ones restated for inflation with the BLS Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. city average, all items, annual average. A five-year estimate is published in the dollars of its final year, so 2016-2020 is adjusted from 2020 dollars. The adjustment is the same for every place in a period, so it changes no ranking; it says what a figure from an earlier period would be in today's money. It is not a local cost of living, and the margin of error is still the published one.

Total annual wages over average employment over 52 weeks, both counts stored so the division can be checked -- which is also how it is moved onto a district, the pair allocated separately and divided at the end. An AVERAGE, not a median: a handful of very large pay packets pull it well above what a typical worker earns, and median household income elsewhere on this site is the better measure of that. Counts jobs covered by unemployment insurance, which is about 95% of civilian wage and salary employment. It excludes most self-employment, most farm work on small farms, and some religious organisations, so it is a smaller number than the payroll survey's and is not a substitute for it. Published for counties, not for congressional districts. A district's figure is built by moving each overlapping county's counts across the county-to-district crosswalk and dividing at the end -- never by averaging county rates. The coverage column gives the share of the district's residents living in counties that reported.

Compare this district with another

Who represented this district

Every member who held NE-3, grouped by the stretches over which these lines stayed the same. The groups break where the chart above breaks, because the members either side of a redraw represented different ground.

Every member who held NE-3, grouped by the stretches over which the district lines stayed the same.
MemberPartyYearsLines in force
Adrian Smith · 2 termsRepublican2009–2013111th–112th Congresses
Lines redrawn for the 113th Congress — figures above and below describe different areas.Adrian Smith · 5 termsRepublican2013–2023113th–116th Congresses
Lines redrawn for the 118th Congress — figures above and below describe different areas.Adrian Smith · 2 termsRepublican2023–present118th–119th Congresses

Party is the party held during that term, not the member’s party today. A stretch ends where the district was redrawn: the members either side of a break represented different ground, so the seat number is the only thing they have in common. Nothing here says a member caused any figure on this page to move. Source: unitedstates/congress-legislators.