yourstate.us

Wisconsin

WI · 8 congressional seats · 2 Senate seats · Federal money in Wisconsin

Get this as JSON

Wisconsin by congressional district

Wisconsin broken into its seats. Click a district to open its own page, where every figure below is measured against the boundaries in force when it was published.

District lines may not be completely accurate. To find out which district your city resides in, please see:Who Represents Me?

Hover a district for its representative; click to open it. Wisconsin, 119th Congress.

Colour shows the party of the sitting member, not the value — the figure and its trend are in the hover card. US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020-2024. A change since a member took office is not evidence that they caused it. City points and populations: U.S. Census Bureau (Gazetteer 2025, population estimates 2025, ACS 2020–2024).

Embed this chart

Current senator

Tammy Baldwin

Democrat · holding this seat since 2013

Recorded votes

Yea 9,397Nay 5,179

of 14,774 roll calls across their career.

Government experience

  • Senate · WI2025–2031
  • Senate · WI2019–2025
  • Senate · WI2013–2019
  • House · WI-22011–2013
  • House · WI-22009–2011
  • House · WI-22007–2009
  • House · WI-22005–2007
  • House · WI-22003–2005
  • House · WI-22001–2003
  • House · WI-21999–2001

Where their votes land

Democratic side0 · Voted with Democrats almost every timeRepublican side
  • Average Senate Democrat: 2
  • Average Senate Republican: 97

Overall, averaged across 10 values of hand-picked votes that split the parties.

Embed this chart

Where the money came from

Receipts into Tammy Baldwin’s own campaign committee over the 2025–2026 election cycle, through June 30, 2026.

  • Small individual donors$1,324,317
  • Large individual donors$1,214,684
  • PACs$127,264
  • Other and unclassified$157,176
  • Total receipts$2,823,441
Embed this chart
What these categories mean
Small individual donors
People whose giving stayed under $200 in total. The FEC does not require them to be named, so who they are is genuinely unknown — not merely unlisted.
Large individual donors
People whose giving passed $200, which is the point at which the campaign must report their name, employer and occupation.
PACs
Political action committees — corporate, trade, union and ideological. Money from an organisation rather than from a person.
Other and unclassified
The remainder once every category above is accounted for: federal funds, offsets, interest, and anything this site could not classify. It is a residual, not a kind of donor.

This is money the campaign itself received. It is not everything spent to win the seat. It excludes leadership PACs, and it excludes independent expenditures and other outside spending — money spent to elect or defeat a candidate by groups they may not lawfully coordinate with, which in a contested race can exceed everything shown above. It is not personal income or net worth, which are a separate filing altogether. Figures are as filed with the Federal Election Commission and are only as current as the last report, covering through June 30, 2026; a cycle still running is a partial count. Check this filing on fec.gov.

Personal finances

Separately from the campaign money above, Tammy Baldwin files a report about their own money: what they own, what they owe, what they earn outside Congress, and every stock trade they make. The law requires it, and every figure in it is a range rather than an amount — which is why the columns below are ranges too.

What they report owning, and owing
  • Reported assets$601k to $1.3M4 lines, 1 with no figure
  • Reported debts$250k to $500k1 line

Every column is read from $0. The solid height is the total of the low ends of the bands the filer ticked; the pale cap runs on to the total of the high ends, and is the range the form allows — not a margin of error and not a guess. Assets less debts comes to $101k to $1.0M — a range, and not a net worth: the form does not ask about a personal residence that earns nothing, about congressional salary, or about the exact value of anything.

Embed this chart
What the holdings are
  • Trusts1 holding$500k to $1.0M
  • Bonds, cash and other securities2 holdings$101k to $265k
  • Retirement, pensions and insurance1 holding, 1 with no figure—
  • Every group$601k to $1.3M

A slice needs one number and a filer ticks a range, so each arc is its group’s floor — the total of the low ends they ticked — and the figure in the hole is the total of those floors. The band printed beside each group is the real answer, and it is wider than the arc. 1 holding carry no figure at all and are in no arc.

Embed this chart

From Tammy Baldwin’s own financial disclosure, filed under the Ethics in Government Act. Every figure is the band the filer ticked.

Current senator

Ron Johnson

Republican · holding this seat since 2011

Recorded votes

Yea 3,172Nay 2,193

of 5,519 roll calls across their career.

Government experience

  • Senate · WI2023–2029
  • Senate · WI2017–2023
  • Senate · WI2011–2017

Where their votes land

Democratic side100 · Voted with Republicans almost every timeRepublican side
  • Average Senate Democrat: 2
  • Average Senate Republican: 97

Overall, averaged across 10 values of hand-picked votes that split the parties.

Embed this chart

Where the money came from

Receipts into Ron Johnson’s own campaign committee over the 2025–2026 election cycle, through June 30, 2026.

  • Small individual donors$265,896
  • Large individual donors$724,071
  • PACs$32,000
  • Other and unclassified$65,746
  • Total receipts$1,087,713
Embed this chart
What these categories mean
Small individual donors
People whose giving stayed under $200 in total. The FEC does not require them to be named, so who they are is genuinely unknown — not merely unlisted.
Large individual donors
People whose giving passed $200, which is the point at which the campaign must report their name, employer and occupation.
PACs
Political action committees — corporate, trade, union and ideological. Money from an organisation rather than from a person.
Other and unclassified
The remainder once every category above is accounted for: federal funds, offsets, interest, and anything this site could not classify. It is a residual, not a kind of donor.

This is money the campaign itself received. It is not everything spent to win the seat. It excludes leadership PACs, and it excludes independent expenditures and other outside spending — money spent to elect or defeat a candidate by groups they may not lawfully coordinate with, which in a contested race can exceed everything shown above. It is not personal income or net worth, which are a separate filing altogether. Figures are as filed with the Federal Election Commission and are only as current as the last report, covering through June 30, 2026; a cycle still running is a partial count. Check this filing on fec.gov.

Personal finances

Separately from the campaign money above, Ron Johnson files a report about their own money: what they own, what they owe, what they earn outside Congress, and every stock trade they make. The law requires it, and every figure in it is a range rather than an amount — which is why the columns below are ranges too.

What they report owning, and owing
  • Reported assets$27M to $131M13 lines, 2 with no figure

Every column is read from $0. The solid height is the total of the low ends of the bands the filer ticked; the pale cap runs on to the total of the high ends, and is the range the form allows — not a margin of error and not a guess. Assets less debts comes to — — a range, and not a net worth: the form does not ask about a personal residence that earns nothing, about congressional salary, or about the exact value of anything.

Embed this chart
What the holdings are
  • Funds and managed accounts3 holdings, 1 with no figure$10M to $50M
  • Bonds, cash and other securities7 holdings$6.7M to $31M
  • Private businesses and partnerships2 holdings, 1 with no figure$5.0M to $25M
  • Property and land1 holding$5.0M to $25M
  • Every group$27M to $131M

A slice needs one number and a filer ticks a range, so each arc is its group’s floor — the total of the low ends they ticked — and the figure in the hole is the total of those floors. The band printed beside each group is the real answer, and it is wider than the arc. 2 holdings carry no figure at all and are in no arc.

Embed this chart

From Ron Johnson’s own financial disclosure, filed under the Ethics in Government Act. Every figure is the band the filer ticked.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes no inflation rate for Wisconsin: prices are collected from a sample built for the nation, the four Census regions and a handful of large metro areas, and nothing in it supports a state figure. The nearest published figure is the Midwest region's, below. See inflation for the country and the four regions.

MeasureValueOver a yearPeriod
Gross domestic product$453.3B up $21.4B2024
Real GDP growth2.1%already a 12-month change2024
GDP per person$76,093 up 4.5%2024
Payroll jobs3.1Mprelim. up 19.4kAugust 2026
Jobs added over 12 months19,400prelim.already a 12-month changeAugust 2026
Unemployment rate (monthly)3.2%prelim. up 0.1 ppAugust 2026
Covered jobs2.9Mno figure a year earlier2024
Average weekly wage$1,220no figure a year earlier2024
Personal income per person$67,799 up 4.5%2024
Goods exported$27.2B down $688.6M2025
Goods imported$36.5B down $2.2B2025
Trade balance in goods-$9.3B up $1.5B2025
Business establishments203.4kno figure a year earlier2024

Every figure here is one its source published for Wisconsinitself — nothing is summed from the districts. Payroll jobs and the monthly unemployment rate are seasonally adjusted, and the two newest months of the payroll series are preliminary and get revised. Output is counted where production happens and income where people live, so the two say different things about the same state. An arrow is coloured by the direction its own measure counts as improvement — green on rising output, jobs, income and exports, green on a falling unemployment rate — and stays grey where there is no such direction to claim, as for imports and the count of businesses. The colour is not a claim about anybody.

Latest figures

Click one of the figures to see how it has changed over time.

IndicatorValueMargin of errorPeriod
Total population5,914,872—2020-2024
Median age40.2 yrs± 0.1 yrs2020-2024
Median household income$77,485± $4552020-2024
Poverty rate10.6%± 0.1%2020-2024
Child poverty rate12.8%± 0.3%2020-2024
Unemployment rate3.2%± 0.1%2020-2024
Households receiving SNAP11.1%± 0.1%2020-2024
Income inequality (Gini index)0.444± 0.0022020-2024
Median home value$266,500± $1,0512020-2024
Median gross rent$1,087± $42020-2024
Cost-burdened renters43.7%± 0.5%2020-2024
Homeownership rate67.8%± 0.3%2020-2024
Housing vacancy rate10.8%± 0.2%2020-2024
Uninsured rate5.2%± 0.1%2020-2024
Disability rate12.3%± 0.1%2020-2024
Drug overdose deaths26.6 per 100k—2022-2024
Child mortality50.4 per 100k—2020-2024
Low birth weight7.8%—2020-2024
Teen birth rate4.6 per 1k± 1.0 per 1k2020-2024
Bachelor's degree or higher33.4%± 0.2%2020-2024
Households without internet access6.9%± 0.1%2020-2024
Firearm fatalities13.0 per 100k—2020-2024
Injury deaths101.6 per 100k—2020-2024
Motor vehicle crash deaths10.6 per 100k—2020-2024

US Census Bureau, American Community Survey; CDC WONDER, National Center for Health Statistics. Margins of error are at the 90% confidence level. An estimate is not a count. Every figure here is one its source published for Wisconsin itself. Nothing is averaged up from the districts, because five of these indicators are medians and the average of medians is not a median, and nothing is summed from counties. No figure here is shown as a change since anybody took office: a state has two senators who took their seats in different years, so there is no single tenure to measure from.

Median household income over time, 2005-2009 to 2020-2024

Pick an indicator, and a second to compare it with. Where they share a unit and a scale they are read against one axis; where they do not, the second gets an axis of its own on the right — nothing is rebased or rescaled to make two units meet. Tick the box to draw them apart instead.

Reference line

Half of households in Wisconsin earn more than this, half less.

Point at the chart to read a period.

$50,000$60,000$70,000$80,000$90,0002005-20092008-20122011-20152014-20182017-20212020-2024
  • Wisconsin$77,485 · 2020-2024
  • United Statesreference$80,734 · 2020-2024

Wisconsin · 2005-2009 to 2020-2024 · United States, dashed · US Census Bureau, American Community Survey

Embed this chart
Median household income by period, with 90% margins of error, the same figures in 2025 dollars, and United States at the same periods.
PeriodMedian incomeIn 2025 dollarsMargin of errorUnited States (reference)
2005-2009$51,569$77,387± $163$51,425
2006-2010$51,598$76,180± $143$51,914
2007-2011$52,374$74,960± $177$52,762
2008-2012$52,627$73,795± $183$53,046
2009-2013$52,413$72,434± $173$53,046
2010-2014$52,738$71,720± $201$53,482
2011-2015$53,357$72,475± $195$53,889
2012-2016$54,610$73,253± $201$55,322
2013-2017$56,759$74,548± $213$57,652
2014-2018$59,209$75,912± $236$60,293
2015-2019$61,747$77,757± $204$62,843
2016-2020$63,293$78,732± $303$64,994
2017-2021$67,080$79,699± $329$69,021
2018-2022$72,458$79,709± $372$75,149
2019-2023$75,670$79,952± $402$78,538
2020-2024$77,485$79,524± $455$80,734

The "in 2025 dollars" figures are the published ones restated for inflation with the BLS Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. city average, all items, annual average. A five-year estimate is published in the dollars of its final year, so 2016-2020 is adjusted from 2020 dollars. The adjustment is the same for every place in a period, so it changes no ranking; it says what a figure from an earlier period would be in today's money. It is not a local cost of living, and the margin of error is still the published one.

Nominal dollars as published for each period -- not inflation-adjusted. A median cannot be averaged across areas, so this is published district-level data only.

This is a median or an index. It is published as measured and is never re-aggregated from smaller areas — averaging medians does not produce a median.

Districts

Who has represented Wisconsin

Every senator who has held one of Wisconsin’s two seats, newest first. The record carries no Senate class, so this is one chronology rather than two seat lineages — and unlike a district, a state is the same ground throughout, so there is nothing to break the list at.

Every senator who has held a seat for Wisconsin, newest first.
SenatorPartyYears
Tammy Baldwin · 3 termsDemocrat2013–present
Ron Johnson · 3 termsRepublican2011–present
Russell Feingold · 3 termsDemocrat1993–2011
Herb Kohl · 4 termsDemocrat1989–2013
Robert Kasten · 2 termsRepublican1981–1993
Gaylord NelsonDemocrat1975–1981
William Proxmire · 3 termsDemocrat1971–1989
Gaylord Nelson · 2 termsDemocrat1963–1975
William Proxmire · 3 termsDemocrat1957–1971
Joseph McCarthy · 2 termsRepublican1947–1957
Alexander Wiley · 4 termsRepublican1939–1963
Robert La Follette · 2 termsProgressive1935–1947
Francis DuffyDemocrat1933–1939
Robert La FolletteRepublican1929–1935
John BlaineRepublican1927–1933
Robert La FolletteRepublican1925–1929
Robert La FolletteRepublican1923–1925
Irvine LenrootRepublican1921–1927
Irvine LenrootRepublican1918–1921
Robert La FolletteRepublican1917–1923
Paul HustingDemocrat1915–1917
Robert La FolletteRepublican1911–1917
Isaac StephensonRepublican1909–1915
Isaac StephensonRepublican1907–1909
Robert La FolletteRepublican1906–1911
John SpoonerRepublican1903–1907
Joseph QuarlesRepublican1899–1905
John SpoonerRepublican1897–1903
John MitchellDemocrat1893–1899
William VilasDemocrat1891–1897
Philetus SawyerRepublican1887–1893
John SpoonerRepublican1885–1891
Philetus SawyerRepublican1881–1887
Angus CameronRepublican1881–1885
Matthew CarpenterRepublican1879–1881
Angus CameronRepublican1875–1881
Timothy HoweRepublican1873–1879
Matthew CarpenterRepublican1869–1875
James DoolittleRepublican1863–1869
Timothy Howe · 2 termsRepublican1861–1873
James DoolittleRepublican1857–1863
Charles DurkeeRepublican1855–1861
Henry DodgeDemocrat1851–1857
Isaac Walker · 2 termsDemocrat1848–1855
Henry DodgeDemocrat1848–1851