yourstate.us
Home / House and Senate / Raphael G. Warnock

Raphael G. Warnock

U.S. Senator · GA

Voted Yea 1,556 · Nay 871 across 2,528 recorded votes.

Where their votes land

Democratic side5 · Voted with Democrats almost every timeRepublican side
  • Average Senate Democrat: 2
  • Average Senate Republican: 97

Overall, averaged across 10 values of hand-picked votes that split the parties.

Embed this chart
Get this as JSONEmbed this

Contact their office

Office contact not on file here yet. The Senate directory lists it.

Not sure this is your member? Find who represents you.

Where their votes land

Each scale runs between the two parties. The left end is the side most Democrats took on a set of hand-picked roll-call votes, the right end the side most Republicans took, and Raphael G. Warnock's marker sits at the share of those votes they cast on the Republican side. Votes that most of both parties agreed on are left out, because they cannot show which side anyone was on.

Overall

average of 10 values
Democratic side5 · Voted with Democrats almost every timeRepublican side
  • Average Senate Democrat: 2
  • Average Senate Republican: 97

0 is the Democratic side of every party-split vote and 100 the Republican side of every one. This is the average of the 10 value positions below that rest on 4 or more votes, each counted once however many votes stand behind it; 2 values below have fewer than 4 votes and are drawn but not counted in it.

Embed this chart

  • Health care and prescription costs

    11 of 11 votes
    Broader public coverage and lower drug prices11 of 11 with DemocratsLess federal spending and a smaller government role

  • Reproductive health care

    10 of 11 votes
    Protecting access to abortion, contraception and IVF10 of 10 with DemocratsRestricting abortion and the funding behind it

    Did not vote on one further party-split vote on this value, which is not counted either way.

  • Immigration

    8 of 8 votes
    More legal protection and processing capacity8 of 8 with DemocratsStricter enforcement and less federal benefit access

  • Voting and elections

    8 of 8 votes
    Wider access to the ballot8 of 8 with DemocratsTighter eligibility and identity checks

  • Climate and clean energy

    7 of 7 votes
    Cutting greenhouse-gas emissions faster7 of 7 with DemocratsCheaper energy now and fewer federal mandates

  • Consumer financial protection

    7 of 7 votes
    Stronger federal protection for borrowers7 of 7 with DemocratsLighter regulation of banks and lenders

  • Clean air, water and public land

    6 of 6 votes
    Stronger limits on pollution and development6 of 6 with DemocratsFewer federal restrictions on land and industry

  • Workers, wages and care

    6 of 6 votes
    Stronger bargaining rights and higher wage floors6 of 6 with DemocratsMore employer flexibility and lower labour costs

  • Civil rights and discrimination

    4 of 4 votes
    Broader federal anti-discrimination protection4 of 4 with DemocratsNarrower federal rules, more left to states

  • Taxes and who pays them

    4 of 4 votes
    Higher taxes at the top and stronger collection2 of 4 with DemocratsLower rates and a smaller tax administration

  • War powers

    3 of 3 votes
    Requiring Congress to authorise military force3 of 3 with DemocratsLeaving the deployment decision with the President

    Only 3 votes — fewer than 4, so this is drawn with a hollow marker and not counted in the overall position.

  • Guns

    2 of 2 votes
    Tighter limits on firearms2 of 2 with DemocratsFewer restrictions on lawful gun owners

    Only 2 votes — fewer than 4, so this is drawn with a hollow marker and not counted in the overall position.

Embed this chart

Positions count only the votes this person cast, so two people can be placed on different numbers of votes — the count beside each value says how many. How the votes were chosen, and how each party's side is counted.

Where the money came from

Receipts into Raphael G. Warnock’s own campaign committee over the 2025–2026 election cycle, through June 30, 2026.

  • Small individual donors$1,063,145
  • Large individual donors$1,344,119
  • PACs$75,500
  • Transfers in$103,004
  • Other and unclassified$10,014
  • Total receipts$2,595,782
Embed this chart
See who gave: PACs, individual giving and transfers →
What these categories mean
Small individual donors
People whose giving stayed under $200 in total. The FEC does not require them to be named, so who they are is genuinely unknown — not merely unlisted.
Large individual donors
People whose giving passed $200, which is the point at which the campaign must report their name, employer and occupation.
PACs
Political action committees — corporate, trade, union and ideological. Money from an organisation rather than from a person.
Transfers in
Money moved in from another committee the candidate is authorised by, typically a joint fundraising committee.
Other and unclassified
The remainder once every category above is accounted for: federal funds, offsets, interest, and anything this site could not classify. It is a residual, not a kind of donor.

This is money the campaign itself received. It is not everything spent to win the seat. It excludes leadership PACs, and it excludes independent expenditures and other outside spending — money spent to elect or defeat a candidate by groups they may not lawfully coordinate with, which in a contested race can exceed everything shown above. It is not personal income or net worth, which are a separate filing altogether. Figures are as filed with the Federal Election Commission and are only as current as the last report, covering through June 30, 2026; a cycle still running is a partial count. Check this filing on fec.gov.

Personal finances

Separately from the campaign money above, Raphael G. Warnock files a report about their own money: what they own, what they owe, what they earn outside Congress, and every stock trade they make. The law requires it, and every figure in it is a range rather than an amount — which is why the columns below are ranges too.

What they report owning, and owing
  • Reported assets$884k to $2.1M23 lines, 4 with no figure
  • Reported debts$500k to $1.0M1 line

Every column is read from $0. The solid height is the total of the low ends of the bands the filer ticked; the pale cap runs on to the total of the high ends, and is the range the form allows — not a margin of error and not a guess. Assets less debts comes to -$116k to $1.6M — a range, and not a net worth: the form does not ask about a personal residence that earns nothing, about congressional salary, or about the exact value of anything.

Embed this chart
What the holdings are
  • Funds and managed accounts16 holdings, 1 with no figure$880k to $2.0M
  • Bonds, cash and other securities4 holdings$4k to $60k
  • Retirement, pensions and insurance2 holdings, 2 with no figure—
  • Private businesses and partnerships1 holding, 1 with no figure—
  • Every group$884k to $2.1M

A slice needs one number and a filer ticks a range, so each arc is its group’s floor — the total of the low ends they ticked — and the figure in the hole is the total of those floors. The band printed beside each group is the real answer, and it is wider than the arc. 4 holdings carry no figure at all and are in no arc.

Embed this chart

From Raphael G. Warnock’s own financial disclosure, filed under the Ethics in Government Act. Every figure is the band the filer ticked.

See what they own, owe, earn and trade →

Government experience

ChamberState / DistrictPartyYears
SenateGADemocrat2023–2029
SenateGADemocrat2021–2023

Voting record

Contact my Senator about thisRaphael G. Warnock (opens their office’s page in a new tab)
AllYeaNayPresentNot voting