Gross domestic product
The value of everything produced, in current dollars. Every congressional district, over time and ranked.
Choose a state above to chart its districts over time.
Ranked for 2024, on the 118th Congress lines
| # | District | GDP | In 2025 dollars | Margin of error | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NY-12 New York 12th congressional district | $443.4B allocated | $455.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 2 | NY-13 New York 13th congressional district | $372.4B allocated | $382.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 3 | CA-11 California 11th congressional district | $232.1B allocated | $238.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 4 | NY-10 New York 10th congressional district | $221.6B allocated | $227.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 5 | CA-15 California 15th congressional district | $219.7B allocated | $225.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 6 | DC-AL District of Columbia delegate district (at large) · delegate | $184.3B allocated | $189.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 7 | CA-16 California 16th congressional district | $178.8B allocated | $183.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 8 | MA-7 Massachusetts 7th congressional district | $162.2B allocated | $166.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 9 | WA-7 Washington 7th congressional district | $162.1B allocated | $166.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 10 | WA-9 Washington 9th congressional district | $161.5B allocated | $165.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 11 | CA-17 California 17th congressional district | $158.8B allocated | $163.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 12 | GA-5 Georgia 5th congressional district | $144.4B allocated | $148.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 13 | CO-1 Colorado 1st congressional district | $129.1B allocated | $132.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 14 | MA-5 Massachusetts 5th congressional district | $121.3B allocated | $124.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 15 | TX-37 Texas 37th congressional district | $114.1B allocated | $117.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 16 | WA-8 Washington 8th congressional district | $114.0B allocated | $117.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 17 | CA-18 California 18th congressional district | $113.9B allocated | $116.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 18 | TX-30 Texas 30th congressional district | $111.8B allocated | $114.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 19 | DE-AL Delaware at-large congressional district | $111.0B allocated | $113.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 20 | TX-32 Texas 32nd congressional district | $107.4B allocated | $110.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 21 | TX-23 Texas 23rd congressional district | $107.0B allocated | $109.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 22 | IN-7 Indiana 7th congressional district | $104.6B allocated | $107.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 23 | NC-12 North Carolina 12th congressional district | $104.2B allocated | $107.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 24 | CA-19 California 19th congressional district | $103.9B allocated | $106.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 25 | MN-5 Minnesota 5th congressional district | $101.9B allocated | $104.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 26 | NC-14 North Carolina 14th congressional district | $101.9B allocated | $104.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 27 | WA-1 Washington 1st congressional district | $100.3B allocated | $102.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 28 | MN-3 Minnesota 3rd congressional district | $99.9B allocated | $102.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 29 | TN-5 Tennessee 5th congressional district | $99.0B allocated | $101.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 30 | MA-8 Massachusetts 8th congressional district | $97.7B allocated | $100.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 31 | NJ-12 New Jersey 12th congressional district | $97.6B allocated | $100.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 32 | TX-38 Texas 38th congressional district | $96.6B allocated | $99.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 33 | TX-18 Texas 18th congressional district | $96.2B allocated | $98.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 34 | GA-6 Georgia 6th congressional district | $95.9B allocated | $98.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 35 | TX-29 Texas 29th congressional district | $94.3B allocated | $96.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 36 | MO-1 Missouri 1st congressional district | $94.1B allocated | $96.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 37 | TX-33 Texas 33rd congressional district | $91.7B allocated | $94.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 38 | TX-11 Texas 11th congressional district | $91.5B allocated | $93.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 39 | UT-4 Utah 4th congressional district | $89.7B allocated | $92.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 40 | IL-6 Illinois 6th congressional district | $89.4B allocated | $91.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 41 | MA-3 Massachusetts 3rd congressional district | $89.4B allocated | $91.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 42 | PA-4 Pennsylvania 4th congressional district | $89.1B allocated | $91.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 43 | OH-1 Ohio 1st congressional district | $89.1B allocated | $91.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 44 | NJ-11 New Jersey 11th congressional district | $88.3B allocated | $90.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 45 | MD-3 Maryland 3rd congressional district | $87.8B allocated | $90.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 46 | FL-10 Florida 10th congressional district | $87.7B allocated | $90.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 47 | NY-16 New York 16th congressional district | $87.6B allocated | $89.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 48 | IA-3 Iowa 3rd congressional district | $87.2B allocated | $89.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 49 | MI-11 Michigan 11th congressional district | $87.0B allocated | $89.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 50 | GA-13 Georgia 13th congressional district | $86.1B allocated | $88.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 51 | TX-19 Texas 19th congressional district | $85.6B allocated | $87.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 52 | MD-8 Maryland 8th congressional district | $85.2B allocated | $87.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 53 | IL-3 Illinois 3rd congressional district | $84.6B allocated | $86.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 54 | OH-11 Ohio 11th congressional district | $84.4B allocated | $86.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 55 | TX-7 Texas 7th congressional district | $84.4B allocated | $86.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 56 | OH-3 Ohio 3rd congressional district | $84.4B allocated | $86.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 57 | CA-46 California 46th congressional district | $84.1B allocated | $86.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 58 | NC-2 North Carolina 2nd congressional district | $84.1B allocated | $86.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 59 | CA-47 California 47th congressional district | $83.8B allocated | $86.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 60 | IL-10 Illinois 10th congressional district | $83.5B allocated | $85.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 61 | CA-45 California 45th congressional district | $82.7B allocated | $84.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 62 | CA-12 California 12th congressional district | $82.5B allocated | $84.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 63 | NC-4 North Carolina 4th congressional district | $82.4B allocated | $84.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 64 | CT-4 Connecticut 4th congressional district | $82.4B allocated | $84.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 65 | TX-35 Texas 35th congressional district | $82.2B allocated | $84.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 66 | CA-14 California 14th congressional district | $82.1B allocated | $84.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 67 | NY-20 New York 20th congressional district | $81.6B allocated | $83.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 68 | TX-2 Texas 2nd congressional district | $80.8B allocated | $82.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 69 | CA-40 California 40th congressional district | $80.4B allocated | $82.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 70 | MD-7 Maryland 7th congressional district | $80.3B allocated | $82.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 71 | ND-AL North Dakota at-large congressional district | $80.1B allocated | $82.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 72 | TX-3 Texas 3rd congressional district | $79.8B allocated | $81.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 73 | TX-24 Texas 24th congressional district | $79.7B allocated | $81.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 74 | NJ-7 New Jersey 7th congressional district | $79.2B allocated | $81.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 75 | TX-9 Texas 9th congressional district | $79.1B allocated | $81.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 76 | IL-5 Illinois 5th congressional district | $79.1B allocated | $81.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 77 | CA-49 California 49th congressional district | $78.7B allocated | $80.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 78 | IL-4 Illinois 4th congressional district | $78.6B allocated | $80.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 79 | NE-2 Nebraska 2nd congressional district | $78.3B allocated | $80.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 80 | NJ-3 New Jersey 3rd congressional district | $78.1B allocated | $80.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 81 | CA-32 California 32nd congressional district | $77.7B allocated | $79.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 82 | IL-7 Illinois 7th congressional district | $77.7B allocated | $79.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 83 | NJ-5 New Jersey 5th congressional district | $77.1B allocated | $79.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 84 | TX-5 Texas 5th congressional district | $77.1B allocated | $79.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 85 | CA-51 California 51st congressional district | $77.0B allocated | $79.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 86 | SD-AL South Dakota at-large congressional district | $76.8B allocated | $78.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 87 | IL-8 Illinois 8th congressional district | $76.7B allocated | $78.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 88 | CA-34 California 34th congressional district | $76.7B allocated | $78.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 89 | CA-52 California 52nd congressional district | $76.6B allocated | $78.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 90 | CA-38 California 38th congressional district | $76.4B allocated | $78.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 91 | CO-2 Colorado 2nd congressional district | $76.2B allocated | $78.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 92 | CA-44 California 44th congressional district | $76.2B allocated | $78.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 93 | CT-1 Connecticut 1st congressional district | $76.1B allocated | $78.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 94 | TX-8 Texas 8th congressional district | $76.1B allocated | $78.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 95 | CA-37 California 37th congressional district | $76.1B allocated | $78.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 96 | CA-30 California 30th congressional district | $75.9B allocated | $77.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 97 | CA-27 California 27th congressional district | $75.9B allocated | $77.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 98 | CA-42 California 42nd congressional district | $75.8B allocated | $77.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 99 | PA-12 Pennsylvania 12th congressional district | $75.7B allocated | $77.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 100 | WI-2 Wisconsin 2nd congressional district | $75.5B allocated | $77.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 101 | CA-31 California 31st congressional district | $75.5B allocated | $77.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 102 | CA-50 California 50th congressional district | $75.4B allocated | $77.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 103 | KY-3 Kentucky 3rd congressional district | $75.3B allocated | $77.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 104 | KS-3 Kansas 3rd congressional district | $75.2B allocated | $77.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 105 | FL-14 Florida 14th congressional district | $75.2B allocated | $77.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 106 | FL-26 Florida 26th congressional district | $75.2B allocated | $77.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 107 | MO-2 Missouri 2nd congressional district | $75.1B allocated | $77.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 108 | CA-29 California 29th congressional district | $75.1B allocated | $77.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 109 | CA-36 California 36th congressional district | $75.1B allocated | $77.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 110 | AZ-4 Arizona 4th congressional district | $75.0B allocated | $77.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 111 | AZ-3 Arizona 3rd congressional district | $75.0B allocated | $77.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 112 | CA-43 California 43rd congressional district | $74.8B allocated | $76.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 113 | FL-24 Florida 24th congressional district | $74.8B allocated | $76.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 114 | AZ-1 Arizona 1st congressional district | $74.7B allocated | $76.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 115 | FL-28 Florida 28th congressional district | $74.7B allocated | $76.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 116 | UT-3 Utah 3rd congressional district | $74.6B allocated | $76.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 117 | OR-3 Oregon 3rd congressional district | $74.4B allocated | $76.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 118 | PA-6 Pennsylvania 6th congressional district | $74.4B allocated | $76.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 119 | AZ-8 Arizona 8th congressional district | $74.3B allocated | $76.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 120 | IL-9 Illinois 9th congressional district | $74.0B allocated | $76.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 121 | NJ-6 New Jersey 6th congressional district | $73.5B allocated | $75.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 122 | CA-28 California 28th congressional district | $73.1B allocated | $75.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 123 | TX-36 Texas 36th congressional district | $73.1B allocated | $75.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 124 | OH-15 Ohio 15th congressional district | $73.0B allocated | $74.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 125 | FL-27 Florida 27th congressional district | $73.0B allocated | $74.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 126 | UT-2 Utah 2nd congressional district | $72.9B allocated | $74.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 127 | OH-8 Ohio 8th congressional district | $72.7B allocated | $74.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 128 | FL-5 Florida 5th congressional district | $72.5B allocated | $74.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 129 | NY-4 New York 4th congressional district | $72.4B allocated | $74.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 130 | FL-22 Florida 22nd congressional district | $72.1B allocated | $74.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 131 | GA-7 Georgia 7th congressional district | $71.7B allocated | $73.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 132 | MA-6 Massachusetts 6th congressional district | $71.7B allocated | $73.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 133 | OH-7 Ohio 7th congressional district | $71.7B allocated | $73.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 134 | AK-AL Alaska at-large congressional district | $71.6B allocated | $73.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 135 | CO-6 Colorado 6th congressional district | $71.4B allocated | $73.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 136 | IL-1 Illinois 1st congressional district | $71.3B allocated | $73.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 137 | PA-17 Pennsylvania 17th congressional district | $71.3B allocated | $73.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 138 | LA-2 Louisiana 2nd congressional district | $71.3B allocated | $73.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 139 | TN-9 Tennessee 9th congressional district | $71.1B allocated | $73.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 140 | NY-1 New York 1st congressional district | $70.9B allocated | $72.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 141 | NY-2 New York 2nd congressional district | $70.7B allocated | $72.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 142 | FL-20 Florida 20th congressional district | $70.3B allocated | $72.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 143 | TX-10 Texas 10th congressional district | $70.1B allocated | $72.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 144 | VA-3 Virginia 3rd congressional district | $69.9B allocated | $71.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 145 | NV-2 Nevada 2nd congressional district | $69.9B allocated | $71.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 146 | CT-5 Connecticut 5th congressional district | $69.8B allocated | $71.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 147 | NJ-8 New Jersey 8th congressional district | $69.6B allocated | $71.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 148 | CA-2 California 2nd congressional district | $69.5B allocated | $71.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 149 | FL-23 Florida 23rd congressional district | $69.3B allocated | $71.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 150 | NJ-10 New Jersey 10th congressional district | $69.1B allocated | $70.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 151 | IL-2 Illinois 2nd congressional district | $69.0B allocated | $70.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 152 | OR-1 Oregon 1st congressional district | $68.9B allocated | $70.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 153 | FL-25 Florida 25th congressional district | $68.6B allocated | $70.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 154 | NY-17 New York 17th congressional district | $68.5B allocated | $70.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 155 | VA-4 Virginia 4th congressional district | $68.5B allocated | $70.3B | — | 78% |
| 156 | TX-13 Texas 13th congressional district | $68.3B allocated | $70.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 157 | CA-24 California 24th congressional district | $68.3B allocated | $70.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 158 | NV-3 Nevada 3rd congressional district | $67.9B allocated | $69.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 159 | ID-2 Idaho 2nd congressional district | $67.9B allocated | $69.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 160 | LA-6 Louisiana 6th congressional district | $67.7B allocated | $69.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 161 | MA-4 Massachusetts 4th congressional district | $67.6B allocated | $69.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 162 | VA-8 Virginia 8th congressional district | $67.1B allocated | $68.8B | — | 51% |
| 163 | FL-15 Florida 15th congressional district | $66.8B allocated | $68.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 164 | NY-3 New York 3rd congressional district | $66.6B allocated | $68.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 165 | MO-5 Missouri 5th congressional district | $66.5B allocated | $68.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 166 | AZ-5 Arizona 5th congressional district | $66.4B allocated | $68.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 167 | MI-6 Michigan 6th congressional district | $66.3B allocated | $68.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 168 | MN-4 Minnesota 4th congressional district | $66.2B allocated | $68.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 169 | CT-2 Connecticut 2nd congressional district | $66.1B allocated | $67.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 170 | NV-4 Nevada 4th congressional district | $66.0B allocated | $67.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 171 | NY-25 New York 25th congressional district | $65.9B allocated | $67.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 172 | IL-11 Illinois 11th congressional district | $65.9B allocated | $67.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 173 | TN-7 Tennessee 7th congressional district | $65.7B allocated | $67.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 174 | CA-7 California 7th congressional district | $65.3B allocated | $67.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 175 | FL-16 Florida 16th congressional district | $65.3B allocated | $67.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 176 | NV-1 Nevada 1st congressional district | $65.2B allocated | $66.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 177 | CA-4 California 4th congressional district | $65.1B allocated | $66.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 178 | PA-10 Pennsylvania 10th congressional district | $65.0B allocated | $66.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 179 | CA-48 California 48th congressional district | $64.8B allocated | $66.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 180 | PA-3 Pennsylvania 3rd congressional district | $64.8B allocated | $66.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 181 | CA-6 California 6th congressional district | $64.7B allocated | $66.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 182 | CA-10 California 10th congressional district | $64.4B allocated | $66.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 183 | GA-11 Georgia 11th congressional district | $64.3B allocated | $66.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 184 | PA-2 Pennsylvania 2nd congressional district | $64.1B allocated | $65.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 185 | PA-1 Pennsylvania 1st congressional district | $64.1B allocated | $65.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 186 | WI-5 Wisconsin 5th congressional district | $64.0B allocated | $65.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 187 | MI-3 Michigan 3rd congressional district | $63.9B allocated | $65.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 188 | IA-2 Iowa 2nd congressional district | $63.8B allocated | $65.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 189 | MD-6 Maryland 6th congressional district | $63.7B allocated | $65.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 190 | CA-26 California 26th congressional district | $63.5B allocated | $65.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 191 | PA-5 Pennsylvania 5th congressional district | $63.5B allocated | $65.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 192 | OK-1 Oklahoma 1st congressional district | $63.4B allocated | $65.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 193 | AZ-9 Arizona 9th congressional district | $63.4B allocated | $65.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 194 | IN-6 Indiana 6th congressional district | $63.2B allocated | $64.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 195 | FL-4 Florida 4th congressional district | $63.0B allocated | $64.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 196 | NY-26 New York 26th congressional district | $62.7B allocated | $64.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 197 | HI-1 Hawaii 1st congressional district | $62.7B allocated | $64.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 198 | CA-8 California 8th congressional district | $62.6B allocated | $64.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 199 | NJ-9 New Jersey 9th congressional district | $62.6B allocated | $64.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 200 | TX-4 Texas 4th congressional district | $62.5B allocated | $64.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 201 | FL-13 Florida 13th congressional district | $62.5B allocated | $64.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 202 | CT-3 Connecticut 3rd congressional district | $62.4B allocated | $64.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 203 | NC-13 North Carolina 13th congressional district | $62.3B allocated | $63.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 204 | UT-1 Utah 1st congressional district | $62.3B allocated | $63.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 205 | TN-3 Tennessee 3rd congressional district | $62.1B allocated | $63.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 206 | WI-4 Wisconsin 4th congressional district | $61.8B allocated | $63.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 207 | MD-2 Maryland 2nd congressional district | $61.6B allocated | $63.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 208 | MD-5 Maryland 5th congressional district | $61.6B allocated | $63.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 209 | SC-4 South Carolina 4th congressional district | $61.6B allocated | $63.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 210 | TX-20 Texas 20th congressional district | $61.4B allocated | $63.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 211 | TX-12 Texas 12th congressional district | $61.3B allocated | $63.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 212 | ID-1 Idaho 1st congressional district | $61.1B allocated | $62.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 213 | CO-8 Colorado 8th congressional district | $61.0B allocated | $62.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 214 | TN-6 Tennessee 6th congressional district | $60.9B allocated | $62.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 215 | TX-14 Texas 14th congressional district | $60.7B allocated | $62.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 216 | CA-3 California 3rd congressional district | $60.5B allocated | $62.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 217 | IA-4 Iowa 4th congressional district | $60.5B allocated | $62.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 218 | NY-22 New York 22nd congressional district | $60.3B allocated | $61.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 219 | SC-6 South Carolina 6th congressional district | $60.2B allocated | $61.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 220 | FL-11 Florida 11th congressional district | $60.1B allocated | $61.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 221 | NH-2 New Hampshire 2nd congressional district | $60.0B allocated | $61.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 222 | MI-12 Michigan 12th congressional district | $59.8B allocated | $61.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 223 | TX-27 Texas 27th congressional district | $59.8B allocated | $61.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 224 | OK-5 Oklahoma 5th congressional district | $59.7B allocated | $61.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 225 | TX-6 Texas 6th congressional district | $59.7B allocated | $61.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 226 | NC-6 North Carolina 6th congressional district | $59.6B allocated | $61.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 227 | ME-1 Maine 1st congressional district | $59.6B allocated | $61.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 228 | NH-1 New Hampshire 1st congressional district | $59.3B allocated | $60.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 229 | WA-2 Washington 2nd congressional district | $59.3B allocated | $60.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 230 | CO-4 Colorado 4th congressional district | $59.2B allocated | $60.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 231 | TN-2 Tennessee 2nd congressional district | $59.0B allocated | $60.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 232 | CO-7 Colorado 7th congressional district | $58.9B allocated | $60.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 233 | FL-9 Florida 9th congressional district | $58.8B allocated | $60.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 234 | AL-5 Alabama 5th congressional district | $58.6B allocated | $60.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 235 | OH-10 Ohio 10th congressional district | $58.5B allocated | $60.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 236 | MA-9 Massachusetts 9th congressional district | $58.4B allocated | $60.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 237 | WV-2 West Virginia 2nd congressional district | $58.1B allocated | $59.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 238 | TX-17 Texas 17th congressional district | $58.0B allocated | $59.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 239 | TX-21 Texas 21st congressional district | $57.9B allocated | $59.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 240 | MA-2 Massachusetts 2nd congressional district | $57.8B allocated | $59.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 241 | FL-19 Florida 19th congressional district | $57.7B allocated | $59.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 242 | OH-9 Ohio 9th congressional district | $57.5B allocated | $59.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 243 | AL-6 Alabama 6th congressional district | $57.2B allocated | $58.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 244 | AR-3 Arkansas 3rd congressional district | $57.1B allocated | $58.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 245 | FL-17 Florida 17th congressional district | $56.7B allocated | $58.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 246 | GA-1 Georgia 1st congressional district | $56.6B allocated | $58.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 247 | WI-8 Wisconsin 8th congressional district | $56.5B allocated | $57.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 248 | PA-7 Pennsylvania 7th congressional district | $56.3B allocated | $57.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 249 | IN-2 Indiana 2nd congressional district | $56.2B allocated | $57.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 250 | MI-13 Michigan 13th congressional district | $56.2B allocated | $57.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 251 | NE-3 Nebraska 3rd congressional district | $56.2B allocated | $57.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 252 | IN-8 Indiana 8th congressional district | $56.2B allocated | $57.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 253 | OH-4 Ohio 4th congressional district | $55.9B allocated | $57.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 254 | GA-4 Georgia 4th congressional district | $55.8B allocated | $57.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 255 | OK-3 Oklahoma 3rd congressional district | $55.7B allocated | $57.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 256 | OH-13 Ohio 13th congressional district | $55.6B allocated | $57.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 257 | FL-21 Florida 21st congressional district | $55.6B allocated | $57.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 258 | MN-2 Minnesota 2nd congressional district | $55.4B allocated | $56.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 259 | FL-1 Florida 1st congressional district | $55.3B allocated | $56.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 260 | TX-25 Texas 25th congressional district | $55.0B allocated | $56.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 261 | WA-10 Washington 10th congressional district | $54.9B allocated | $56.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 262 | SC-1 South Carolina 1st congressional district | $54.9B allocated | $56.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 263 | FL-8 Florida 8th congressional district | $54.8B allocated | $56.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 264 | IL-17 Illinois 17th congressional district | $54.8B allocated | $56.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 265 | NE-1 Nebraska 1st congressional district | $54.8B allocated | $56.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 266 | TX-28 Texas 28th congressional district | $54.6B allocated | $56.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 267 | TX-26 Texas 26th congressional district | $54.6B allocated | $56.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 268 | CO-5 Colorado 5th congressional district | $54.4B allocated | $55.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 269 | WA-5 Washington 5th congressional district | $54.3B allocated | $55.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 270 | IA-1 Iowa 1st congressional district | $54.2B allocated | $55.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 271 | TX-22 Texas 22nd congressional district | $54.0B allocated | $55.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 272 | AL-7 Alabama 7th congressional district | $53.9B allocated | $55.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 273 | TX-1 Texas 1st congressional district | $53.6B allocated | $55.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 274 | NJ-2 New Jersey 2nd congressional district | $53.6B allocated | $55.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 275 | CA-35 California 35th congressional district | $53.4B allocated | $54.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 276 | MD-4 Maryland 4th congressional district | $53.3B allocated | $54.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 277 | IL-16 Illinois 16th congressional district | $53.3B allocated | $54.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 278 | LA-1 Louisiana 1st congressional district | $53.2B allocated | $54.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 279 | LA-3 Louisiana 3rd congressional district | $53.2B allocated | $54.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 280 | PA-11 Pennsylvania 11th congressional district | $53.1B allocated | $54.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 281 | MN-1 Minnesota 1st congressional district | $53.1B allocated | $54.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 282 | AZ-7 Arizona 7th congressional district | $52.7B allocated | $54.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 283 | KS-4 Kansas 4th congressional district | $52.7B allocated | $54.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 284 | OR-5 Oregon 5th congressional district | $52.6B allocated | $54.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 285 | MA-1 Massachusetts 1st congressional district | $52.5B allocated | $53.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 286 | MD-1 Maryland 1st congressional district | $52.5B allocated | $53.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 287 | AR-2 Arkansas 2nd congressional district | $52.4B allocated | $53.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 288 | WA-4 Washington 4th congressional district | $52.4B allocated | $53.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 289 | MI-4 Michigan 4th congressional district | $52.3B allocated | $53.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 290 | IN-3 Indiana 3rd congressional district | $52.3B allocated | $53.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 291 | SC-2 South Carolina 2nd congressional district | $52.2B allocated | $53.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 292 | NY-18 New York 18th congressional district | $52.2B allocated | $53.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 293 | MI-10 Michigan 10th congressional district | $52.1B allocated | $53.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 294 | GA-9 Georgia 9th congressional district | $52.0B allocated | $53.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 295 | WI-6 Wisconsin 6th congressional district | $52.0B allocated | $53.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 296 | IN-5 Indiana 5th congressional district | $51.9B allocated | $53.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 297 | KS-2 Kansas 2nd congressional district | $51.7B allocated | $53.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 298 | MI-9 Michigan 9th congressional district | $51.6B allocated | $53.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 299 | NY-23 New York 23rd congressional district | $51.5B allocated | $52.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 300 | WY-AL Wyoming at-large congressional district | $51.5B allocated | $52.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 301 | MI-7 Michigan 7th congressional district | $51.5B allocated | $52.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 302 | IL-13 Illinois 13th congressional district | $51.2B allocated | $52.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 303 | TX-31 Texas 31st congressional district | $51.0B allocated | $52.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 304 | NJ-1 New Jersey 1st congressional district | $51.0B allocated | $52.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 305 | KY-4 Kentucky 4th congressional district | $50.8B allocated | $52.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 306 | KS-1 Kansas 1st congressional district | $50.8B allocated | $52.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 307 | VA-2 Virginia 2nd congressional district | $50.8B allocated | $52.1B | — | 98% |
| 308 | KY-6 Kentucky 6th congressional district | $50.8B allocated | $52.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 309 | CA-22 California 22nd congressional district | $50.3B allocated | $51.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 310 | FL-7 Florida 7th congressional district | $50.3B allocated | $51.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 311 | NY-24 New York 24th congressional district | $50.2B allocated | $51.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 312 | OR-6 Oregon 6th congressional district | $50.1B allocated | $51.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 313 | FL-2 Florida 2nd congressional district | $50.0B allocated | $51.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 314 | CA-20 California 20th congressional district | $49.8B allocated | $51.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 315 | NC-7 North Carolina 7th congressional district | $49.8B allocated | $51.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 316 | TN-4 Tennessee 4th congressional district | $49.8B allocated | $51.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 317 | WA-3 Washington 3rd congressional district | $49.8B allocated | $51.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 318 | NY-21 New York 21st congressional district | $49.6B allocated | $50.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 319 | NM-3 New Mexico 3rd congressional district | $49.5B allocated | $50.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 320 | VA-10 Virginia 10th congressional district | $49.4B allocated | $50.7B | — | 64% |
| 321 | NM-1 New Mexico 1st congressional district | $49.0B allocated | $50.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 322 | CA-23 California 23rd congressional district | $49.0B allocated | $50.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 323 | WI-3 Wisconsin 3rd congressional district | $48.9B allocated | $50.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 324 | AZ-6 Arizona 6th congressional district | $48.8B allocated | $50.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 325 | PA-14 Pennsylvania 14th congressional district | $48.7B allocated | $50.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 326 | NY-5 New York 5th congressional district | $48.6B allocated | $49.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 327 | WI-1 Wisconsin 1st congressional district | $48.6B allocated | $49.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 328 | IL-14 Illinois 14th congressional district | $48.6B allocated | $49.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 329 | NM-2 New Mexico 2nd congressional district | $48.5B allocated | $49.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 330 | WV-1 West Virginia 1st congressional district | $48.4B allocated | $49.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 331 | MN-7 Minnesota 7th congressional district | $48.3B allocated | $49.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 332 | PA-9 Pennsylvania 9th congressional district | $48.2B allocated | $49.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 333 | NY-19 New York 19th congressional district | $48.1B allocated | $49.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 334 | CA-33 California 33rd congressional district | $47.9B allocated | $49.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 335 | MO-7 Missouri 7th congressional district | $47.8B allocated | $49.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 336 | TN-8 Tennessee 8th congressional district | $47.8B allocated | $49.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 337 | WA-6 Washington 6th congressional district | $47.6B allocated | $48.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 338 | TX-16 Texas 16th congressional district | $47.6B allocated | $48.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 339 | IL-15 Illinois 15th congressional district | $47.5B allocated | $48.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 340 | CO-3 Colorado 3rd congressional district | $47.5B allocated | $48.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 341 | AL-1 Alabama 1st congressional district | $47.4B allocated | $48.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 342 | KY-1 Kentucky 1st congressional district | $47.2B allocated | $48.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 343 | OH-6 Ohio 6th congressional district | $47.0B allocated | $48.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 344 | OK-4 Oklahoma 4th congressional district | $47.0B allocated | $48.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 345 | NC-5 North Carolina 5th congressional district | $46.9B allocated | $48.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 346 | IN-4 Indiana 4th congressional district | $46.9B allocated | $48.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 347 | LA-4 Louisiana 4th congressional district | $46.7B allocated | $48.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 348 | MO-3 Missouri 3rd congressional district | $46.6B allocated | $47.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 349 | OH-5 Ohio 5th congressional district | $46.6B allocated | $47.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 350 | VA-1 Virginia 1st congressional district | $46.6B allocated | $47.8B | — | 78% |
| 351 | CA-21 California 21st congressional district | $46.4B allocated | $47.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 352 | NJ-4 New Jersey 4th congressional district | $46.3B allocated | $47.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 353 | VT-AL Vermont at-large congressional district | $46.3B allocated | $47.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 354 | WI-7 Wisconsin 7th congressional district | $46.1B allocated | $47.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 355 | TN-1 Tennessee 1st congressional district | $45.9B allocated | $47.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 356 | CA-9 California 9th congressional district | $45.8B allocated | $47.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 357 | GA-2 Georgia 2nd congressional district | $45.6B allocated | $46.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 358 | CA-25 California 25th congressional district | $45.6B allocated | $46.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 359 | NC-10 North Carolina 10th congressional district | $45.4B allocated | $46.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 360 | IN-1 Indiana 1st congressional district | $45.4B allocated | $46.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 361 | NY-6 New York 6th congressional district | $45.3B allocated | $46.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 362 | NC-11 North Carolina 11th congressional district | $45.2B allocated | $46.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 363 | OH-12 Ohio 12th congressional district | $44.9B allocated | $46.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 364 | PA-8 Pennsylvania 8th congressional district | $44.8B allocated | $46.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 365 | CA-1 California 1st congressional district | $44.8B allocated | $45.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 366 | OH-14 Ohio 14th congressional district | $44.6B allocated | $45.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 367 | MO-6 Missouri 6th congressional district | $44.6B allocated | $45.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 368 | CA-5 California 5th congressional district | $44.5B allocated | $45.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 369 | SC-7 South Carolina 7th congressional district | $44.2B allocated | $45.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 370 | NC-3 North Carolina 3rd congressional district | $43.8B allocated | $45.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 371 | PA-16 Pennsylvania 16th congressional district | $43.8B allocated | $44.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 372 | GA-10 Georgia 10th congressional district | $43.6B allocated | $44.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 373 | SC-5 South Carolina 5th congressional district | $43.6B allocated | $44.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 374 | FL-18 Florida 18th congressional district | $43.6B allocated | $44.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 375 | KY-2 Kentucky 2nd congressional district | $43.5B allocated | $44.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 376 | GA-3 Georgia 3rd congressional district | $43.5B allocated | $44.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 377 | GA-12 Georgia 12th congressional district | $43.4B allocated | $44.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 378 | MN-6 Minnesota 6th congressional district | $43.3B allocated | $44.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 379 | OR-2 Oregon 2nd congressional district | $43.0B allocated | $44.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 380 | CA-41 California 41st congressional district | $43.0B allocated | $44.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 381 | NY-7 New York 7th congressional district | $42.9B allocated | $44.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 382 | MI-8 Michigan 8th congressional district | $42.8B allocated | $43.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 383 | IL-12 Illinois 12th congressional district | $42.7B allocated | $43.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 384 | IN-9 Indiana 9th congressional district | $42.7B allocated | $43.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 385 | AL-2 Alabama 2nd congressional district | $42.6B allocated | $43.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 386 | NY-8 New York 8th congressional district | $42.5B allocated | $43.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 387 | FL-3 Florida 3rd congressional district | $42.4B allocated | $43.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 388 | CA-13 California 13th congressional district | $42.2B allocated | $43.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 389 | HI-2 Hawaii 2nd congressional district | $42.2B allocated | $43.3B | — | 77% |
| 390 | PA-15 Pennsylvania 15th congressional district | $42.0B allocated | $43.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 391 | CA-39 California 39th congressional district | $41.8B allocated | $42.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 392 | MS-3 Mississippi 3rd congressional district | $41.7B allocated | $42.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 393 | MO-4 Missouri 4th congressional district | $41.4B allocated | $42.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 394 | NY-9 New York 9th congressional district | $41.3B allocated | $42.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 395 | OR-4 Oregon 4th congressional district | $41.1B allocated | $42.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 396 | MS-4 Mississippi 4th congressional district | $40.9B allocated | $42.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 397 | MI-5 Michigan 5th congressional district | $40.8B allocated | $41.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 398 | NC-1 North Carolina 1st congressional district | $40.7B allocated | $41.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 399 | AR-4 Arkansas 4th congressional district | $40.6B allocated | $41.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 400 | RI-1 Rhode Island 1st congressional district | $40.4B allocated | $41.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 401 | SC-3 South Carolina 3rd congressional district | $40.4B allocated | $41.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 402 | TX-15 Texas 15th congressional district | $40.2B allocated | $41.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 403 | MT-2 Montana 2nd congressional district | $40.1B allocated | $41.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 404 | RI-2 Rhode Island 2nd congressional district | $40.0B allocated | $41.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 405 | MI-1 Michigan 1st congressional district | $40.0B allocated | $41.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 406 | GA-14 Georgia 14th congressional district | $39.9B allocated | $41.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 407 | AZ-2 Arizona 2nd congressional district | $39.7B allocated | $40.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 408 | ME-2 Maine 2nd congressional district | $39.6B allocated | $40.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 409 | NC-9 North Carolina 9th congressional district | $39.5B allocated | $40.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 410 | MN-8 Minnesota 8th congressional district | $39.5B allocated | $40.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 411 | PA-13 Pennsylvania 13th congressional district | $38.9B allocated | $39.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 412 | GA-8 Georgia 8th congressional district | $38.7B allocated | $39.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 413 | FL-6 Florida 6th congressional district | $38.4B allocated | $39.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 414 | MT-1 Montana 1st congressional district | $38.3B allocated | $39.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 415 | NC-8 North Carolina 8th congressional district | $38.3B allocated | $39.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 416 | NY-11 New York 11th congressional district | $38.2B allocated | $39.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 417 | AR-1 Arkansas 1st congressional district | $38.1B allocated | $39.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 418 | MS-2 Mississippi 2nd congressional district | $38.1B allocated | $39.1B | — | 100.0% |
| 419 | MI-2 Michigan 2nd congressional district | $38.0B allocated | $39.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 420 | OK-2 Oklahoma 2nd congressional district | $37.9B allocated | $38.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 421 | MS-1 Mississippi 1st congressional district | $37.6B allocated | $38.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 422 | OH-2 Ohio 2nd congressional district | $37.3B allocated | $38.3B | — | 100.0% |
| 423 | LA-5 Louisiana 5th congressional district | $37.0B allocated | $38.0B | — | 100.0% |
| 424 | NY-14 New York 14th congressional district | $36.2B allocated | $37.2B | — | 100.0% |
| 425 | AL-4 Alabama 4th congressional district | $32.9B allocated | $33.8B | — | 100.0% |
| 426 | MO-8 Missouri 8th congressional district | $32.7B allocated | $33.6B | — | 100.0% |
| 427 | AL-3 Alabama 3rd congressional district | $32.7B allocated | $33.5B | — | 100.0% |
| 428 | FL-12 Florida 12th congressional district | $32.1B allocated | $32.9B | — | 100.0% |
| 429 | NY-15 New York 15th congressional district | $30.9B allocated | $31.7B | — | 100.0% |
| 430 | TX-34 Texas 34th congressional district | $30.6B allocated | $31.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 431 | KY-5 Kentucky 5th congressional district | $27.7B allocated | $28.4B | — | 100.0% |
| 432 | VA-5 Virginia 5th congressional district | $21.2B allocated | $21.8B | — | 50% |
| 433 | VA-6 Virginia 6th congressional district | $18.7B allocated | $19.2B | — | 33% |
| 434 | VA-7 Virginia 7th congressional district | $18.1B allocated | $18.5B | — | 43% |
| 435 | VA-9 Virginia 9th congressional district | $18.0B allocated | $18.5B | — | 53% |
2024 was published on the lines drawn for the 118th Congress, not today’s. A seat number then did not necessarily cover the ground it covers now, and a seat that no longer exists is not linked.
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis — https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gdp-county-metro-and-other-areas. Margins of error are at the 90% confidence level; districts whose intervals overlap are not meaningfully different, so a rank is not a ranking.
No figure here was published for a congressional district. They are allocated from the counties that overlap each district, weighted by population, and the coverage column gives the share of each district’s residents living in sources that reported. 3 districts are below 50% coverage; treat those as indicative only.
There is no national average for a median: the country's figure cannot be worked out from the districts' figures, and averaging them would give a number nobody published, so none is shown.
The "in 2025 dollars" figures are the published ones restated for inflation with the BLS Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. city average, all items, annual average. A five-year estimate is published in the dollars of its final year, so 2016-2020 is adjusted from 2020 dollars. The adjustment is the same for every place in a period, so it changes no ranking; it says what a figure from an earlier period would be in today's money. It is not a local cost of living, and the margin of error is still the published one.
BEA's all-industry total, in current dollars, not adjusted for inflation -- so part of any rise is prices rather than output; see real GDP growth for the part that is not. National and state figures are BEA's own. BEA publishes this by county. Splitting a county's total between the districts that share it assumes it is spread like the county's population, which is an assumption about where the money is, not a measurement of it -- a county whose refinery sits in one district and whose suburbs sit in another is the case it handles worst. Published for counties, not for congressional districts. A district's figure is built by moving each overlapping county's counts across the county-to-district crosswalk and dividing at the end -- never by averaging county rates. The coverage column gives the share of the district's residents living in counties that reported.